Computer Ethics and Information Systems

Computer morality and Information Security a. substructure The admitation of cipher device morality fundamentally emerged with the birth of data processors. There was disturb right a substance that education bear upon outlines would be p inventiond inappropriately to the detriment of fiat compromising development security measures, or that they would replace humans in most(prenominal) jobs, resolving powering in wide go around job loss. Ethics- Guidelines or rules of conduct that govern our lives, over become, way and dialogue in both human beings and private undertaking. Ethics ar a set of moral principles that govern an individual or a group on what is gratifying behaviour while using a electronic figurer.Computer ethics is a set of moral principles that govern the usage of estimators. peerless of the common issues of electronic estimator ethics is violation of copyright issues. Duplicating copyrighted depicted object without the authors approval, approachinging personalized reading of former(a)s ar round of the examples that appal ethical principles. Security is the degree of security department to guard a nation, marriage of nations, persons or person against danger, legal injury, loss, and offence. Security as a form of protection be structures and processes that add or improve security as a condition.Information security meanspiriteds protecting info and education systems from unauthorised memory access, delectation, disclosure, disruption, modification, perusal, inspection, arrangement or destruction Computer Ethics- is a branch of practical philosophical system which deals with how computing professionals should make closings regarding professional and social conduct. b. Discussion Computer Ethics Ethics deals with placing a value on acts according to whether they are smashing or rubber. Ein truth parliamentary law has its rules almost whether certain acts are ethical or non.These rules con tain been established as a result of consensus in society and are often indite into faithfulnesss. When reck whizzrs first began to be lend oneselfd in society at large, the absence of ethical stocks astir(predicate) their use and cogitate issues caused some problems. However, as their use became widespread in every facet of our lives, discussions in calculator ethics resulted in some kind of a consensus. Today, more of these rules sacrifice been formulated as laws, both national or global. Computer crimes and computer fraud are straight off common terms. There are laws against them, and veryone is responsible for knowing what constitutes computer crime and computer fraud. The Ten Commandments of computer ethics have been defined by the Computer Ethics Institute. Here is our exposition of them 1) yard shalt non use a computer to ruin other raft If it is unethical to harm bulk by making a bomb, for example, it is equally speculative to keep open a program that ha ndles the timing of the bomb. Or, to put it more simply, if it is bad to drop off and destroy other packs curbs and nonebooks, it is equally bad to access and destroy their files. ) Thou shalt not interfere with other peoples computer work Computer viruses are small programs that disrupt other peoples computer work by destroying their files, taking huge amounts of computer term or memory, or by simply displaying annoying messages. Generating and consciously bedspread computer viruses is unethical. 3) Thou shalt not snoop around in other peoples files Reading other peoples e-mail messages is as bad as opening and reading their letters This is invading their privateness. Obtaining other peoples non-public files should be judged the said(prenominal) way as switching into their dwell and stealing their documents.Text documents on the Internet whitethorn be protected by encryption. 4) Thou shalt not use a computer to steal employ a computer to break into the accounts of a compa ny or a criminalisek and transferring money should be judged the same way as robbery. It is culpable and thither are strict laws against it. 5) Thou shalt not use a computer to bear false witness The Internet can spread untruth as fast as it can spread truth. putting out false training to the world is bad. For instance, spreading false rumors astir(predicate) a person or false propaganda about historical fonts is wrong. ) Thou shalt not use or copy software system for which you have not paid Software is an quick-witted product. In that way, it is like a book Obtaining illegal copies of copyrighted software is as bad as photocopying a copyrighted book. There are laws against both. Information about the copyright possessor can be embedded by a process called watermarking into pictures in the digital format. 7) Thou shalt not use other peoples computer resources without ascendency Multiuser systems use user ids and passwords to enforce their memory and time allocations, and to safeguard information.You should not try to bypass this permit system. Hacking a system to break and bypass the authorization is unethical. 8) Thou shalt not appropriate other peoples intellectual output For example, the programs you write for the projects assigned in this course are your sustain intellectual output. Copying somebody elses program without proper authorization is software piracy and is unethical. gifted property is a form of possession, and may be protected by copyright laws. ) Thou shalt turn over about the social consequences of the program you write You have to think about computer issues in a more common social framework stinker the program you write be used in a way that is denigrating to society? For example, if you are works for an animation house, and are producing alert films for children, you are responsible for their contents. Do the animations include scenes that can be harmful to children? In the United States, the Communications Decency Act w as an attempt by lawmakers to ban certain types of content from Internet websites to protect young children from harmful material.That law was struck d proclaim because it violated the free speech principles in that countrys constitution. The discussion, of course, is freeing on. 10) Thou shalt use a computer in ways that press out withdrawation and respect Just like public buses or banks, people using computer communications systems may find themselves in situations where there is some form of queuing and you have to wait for your turn and generally be nice to other people in the environment. The point that you cannot see the people you are interacting with does not mean that you can be rude to them. honorable Issues - Computers in the Workplace Computer Crime Privacy and Anonymity Intellectual Property Professional Responsibility planetaryization Computers in the Workplace. Computers can cast a threat to jobs as people feel they may be replaced by them. However, the compu ter industry already has generated a wide mannikin of saucily jobs. When computers do not eliminate a job, they can radically alter it. In addition to job security concerns, another piece of work concern is health and safety. It is a computer ethics issue to consider how computers impact health and job satisfaction when information technology is intromissionduced into a workplace.Computer Crime. With the proliferation of computer viruses, spyware, phishing and fraud schemes, and hacking activity from every location in the world, computer crime and security are certainly topics of concern when discussing computer ethics. to a fault outsiders, or hackers, many computer crimes, such as embezzlement or planting of logic bombs, are committed by trusted forcefulness who have authorization to use company computer systems. Privacy and Anonymity. adept of the earliest computer ethics topics to arouse public interest was privacy.The eternal sleep and efficiency with which computers and networks can be used to gather, store, search, par, retrieve, and share personal information make computer technology especially threatening to anyone who wishes to keep personal information out of the public do principal(prenominal) or out of the give of those who are sensed as dominance threats. The variety of privacy-related issues generated by computer technology has led to reexamination of the concept of privacy itself. Intellectual Property. superstar of the more controversial areas of computer ethics concerns the intellectual property rights committed with software ownership.Some people, like Richard Stallman, who started the Free Software Foundation, believe that software ownership should not be allowed at all. He claims that all information should be free, and all programs should be available for copying, studying, and modifying by anyone who wishes to do so. Others, such as Deborah Johnson, argue that software companies or programmers would not invest weeks and month s of work and square funds in the development of software if they could not get the coronation back in the form of license fees or sales.Professional Responsibility and sphericalization. Global networks such as the Internet and conglomerates of business-to-business network connections are connecting people and information worldwide. much(prenominal) globalization issues that include ethics considerations include Global laws Global business Global education Global information flows Information-rich and information- scurvy nations Information interpretation The gap surrounded by rich and poor nations, and between rich and poor citizens in industrialized countries, is very wide.As educational opportunities, business and employment opportunities, checkup gains, and many other necessities of life move more and more into cyberspace, gaps between the rich and the poor may become even out worse, leading to mod ethical considerations. Common Computer Ethics Fallacies Although comput er education is showtime to be in unifiedd in lower grades in elementary schools, the escape of early computer education for most current adults led to several(prenominal) documented generally accepted fallacies that apply to nearly all computer users.As technology advances, these fallacies will change new ones will arise, and some of the legitimate fallacies will no longer exist as children learn at an earlier age about computer use, risks, security, and other associated information. There are more than described here, barely Peter S. Tippett identified the following computer ethics fallacies, which have been widely discussed and generally accepted as cosmos representative of the most common. The Computer Game Fallacy. Computer users tend to think that computers will generally close out them from cheating and doing wrong.Programmers particularly believe that an wrongful conduct in programming syntax will prevent it from working, so that if a software program does indeed work , then it must be working correctly and preventing bad things or mistakes from happening. Even computer users in general have gotten the message that computers work with exacting accuracy and will not allow actions that should not occur. Of course, what computer users often do not consider is that although the computer operates under very strict rules, the software programs are written by humans and are just as susceptible to allowing bad things to happen as people often are in their own lives.Along with this, there is to a fault the perception that a person can do something with a computer without being caught, so that if what is being done is not permissible, the computer should somehow prevent them from doing it. The Law-Abiding Citizen Fallacy. Laws provide guidance for many things, including computer use. Sometimes users confuse what is legal with regard to computer use with what is reasonable behavior for using computers. Laws basically define the minimum standard about which actions can be reasonably judged, but such laws as well as call for individual judgment.Computer users often do not realize they also have a responsibility to consider the ramifications of their actions and to behave accordingly. The Shatterproof Fallacy. Many, if not most, computer users believe that they can do little harm accidentally with a computer beyond perhaps erasing or messing up a file. However, computers are tools that can harm, even if computer users are unaware of the fact that their computer actions have actually hurt someone else in some way. For example, sending an email flame to a large group of recipients is the same as publicly humiliating them.Most people realize that they could be sued for libel for making such statements in a physical public forum, but may not realize they are also responsible for what they submit and for their words and accusations on the Internet. As another example, forwarding e-mail without authorization of the author can lead to har m or embarrassment if the superior sender was communicating privately without expectation of his message being seen by any others. Also, using e-mail to stalk someone, to send spam, and to harass or offend the recipient in some way also are harmful uses of computers.Software piracy is yet another example of using computers to, in effect, hurt others. Generally, the shatterproof phantasm is the belief that what a person does with a computer can do minimal harm, and only affects perhaps a few files on the computer itself it is not considering the impact of actions before doing them. The Candy-from-a-Baby Fallacy. amerciable and unethical activity, such as software piracy and plagiarism, are very easy to do with a computer. However, just because it is easy does not mean that it is right.Because of the ease with which computers can make copies, it is likely almost every computer user has committed software piracy of one form or another. The Software Publishers Association (SPA) and B usiness Software Alliance (BSA) studies reveal software piracy costs companies multibillions of dollars. Copying a retail software mailboat without paying for it is theft. Just because doing something wrong with a computer is easy does not mean it is ethical, legal, or acceptable. The Hackers Fallacy.Numerous reports and publications of the commonly accepted hacker belief is that it is acceptable to do anything with a computer as long as the motivating is to learn and not to gain or make a gather from such activities. This so-called hacker ethic is explored in more depth in the following section. The Free Information Fallacy. A somewhat searching opinion of many is the notion that information wants to be free, as mentioned earlier. It is suggested that this fallacy emerged from the fact that it is so easy to copy digital information and to give it widely.However, this line of thinking completely ignores the fact the copying and distribution of data is completely under the go f or and whim of the people who do it, and to a great extent, the people who allow it to happen. Hacking and Hacktivism Hacking is an ambivalent term, most commonly perceived as being part of criminal activities. However, hacking has been used to describe the work of individuals who have been associated with the open-source movement. Many of the developments in information technology have resulted from what has typically been considered as hacking activities.Manuel Castells considers hacker culture as the informationalism that incubates technological breakthrough, identifying hackers as the actors in the transition from an academically and institutionally constructed milieu of innovation to the growing of self-organizing networks transcending organizational control. A hacker was originally a person who sought-after(a) to understand computers as thoroughly as possible. Soon hacking came to be associated with phreaking, gap into phone networks to make free phone calls, which is clearl y illegal.The Hacker Ethic. The creative thinker of a hacker ethic originates in the activities of the original hackers at MIT and Stanford in the 1950s and 1960s. Stephen Levy outlined the so-called hacker ethic as follows 1. Access to computers should be unlimited and total. 2. All information should be free. 3. potency should be mistrusted and decentralization promoted. 4. Hackers should be judged solely by their skills at hacking, or else than by race, class, age, gender, or position. 5. Computers can be used to create art and beauty. . Computers can change your life for the better. The hacker ethic has three main(prenominal) functions 1. It promotes the belief of individual activity over any form of corporate authority or system of ideals. 2. It supports a completely free-market approach to the convert of and access to information. 3. It promotes the belief that computers can have a beneficial and life-changing effect. Such ideas are in conflict with a wide range of comput er professionals dissimilar codes of ethics. Ethics Codes of Conduct and ResourcesSeveral organizations and groups have defined the computer ethics their members should observe and practice. In fact, most professional organizations have adopted a code of ethics, a large percentage of which address how to handle information. To provide the ethics of all professional organizations related to computer use would take on a large book. The following are provided to give you an opportunity to compare similarities between the codes and, most interestingly, to note the differences and sometimes contradictions in the codes followed by the various diverse groups. Information SecurityInformation security means protecting information and information systems from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, perusal, inspection, recording or destruction Information Security Attributes or qualities, i. e. , Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability (CIA). Information Systems are decomposed in three main portions, hardware, software and communications with the purpose to help identify and apply information security industry standards, as mechanisms of protection and prevention, at three levels or layers physical, personal and organizational.Essentially, procedures or policies are implemented to tell people (administrators, users and operators)how to use products to ensure information security within the organizations. Confidentiality Confidentiality is the term used to prevent the disclosure of information to unauthorized individuals or systems. For example, a credit billhook transaction on the Internet requires the credit card number to be transmitted from the buyer to the merchant and from the merchant to a transaction processing network.The system attempts to enforce confidentiality by encrypting the card number during transmission, by restrain the places where it might appear (in databases, log files, backups, printed receipts, and so on), and by r estricting access to the places where it is stored. If an unauthorized party obtains the card number in any way, a breach of confidentiality has occurred. Confidentiality is necessary (but not sufficient) for maintaining the privacy of the people whose personal information a system holds. citation needed IntegrityIn information security, rightfulness means that data cannot be modified undetectably. citation needed This is not the same thing as referential fairness in databases, although it can be viewed as a special fictional character of Consistency as understood in the classic ACID homunculus of transaction processing. Integrity is violated when a message is actively modified in transit. Information security systems typically provide message integrity in addition to data confidentiality. Accessibility For any information system to serve its purpose, the information must be available when it is needed.This means that the computing systems used to store and process the informat ion, the security controls used to protect it, and the communication channels used to access it must be functioning correctly. spunky availability systems aim to remain available at all times, preventing service disruptions due to power outages, hardware failures, and system upgrades. Ensuring availability also involves preventing denial-of-service attacks. genuineness In computing, e-Business, and information security, it is necessary to ensure that the data, transactions, communications or documents (electronic or physical) are genuine.It is also important for authenticity to validate that both parties pertain are who they claim they are. Non-repudiation In law, non-repudiation implies ones intention to fulfill their obligations to a contract. It also implies that one party of a transaction cannot deny having received a transaction nor can the other party deny having sent a transaction. Electronic commerce uses technology such as digital signatures and public key encryption to establish authenticity and non-repudiation. c. ConclusionImpact of Computer Ethics on Information Security The relationship between information security and computer ethics does not look, on the surface, readily obvious, and even appears remote. It is, however, credible. Culture, customs, trust and privacy that characterize security fall within the realm of ethics. Computer ethics alert information security focussing to ethical considerations and warn potential offenders of ethical consequences in situations where the technical tools or the legal measures fail.In these cases, an ethical decision may be helpful in bringing about a solution. Furthermore, this conclusion is consistent with the following premises with respect to technical controls, computer laws and computer ethics Premise 1 The information security management community has applied control tools to meet the information security objectives of safeguarding confidentiality against unauthorized access, upholding integrity and maintaining availability. However, detecting computer crime is difficult, because the act is either traceless or difficult to trace.Quantifying the damage is problematic since the victims all too often fulfil reporting the crime for reasons including fear of recrimination and bad publicity. 8 Therefore, the technical control tools are ineffective, with respect to legal issues. Premise 2 Computer laws have been enacted in various nations at an ever-increasing rate since the late 1980s, when business and the society at large were forced to face the magnitude and severity of damage not experienced prior to computer crimes. There has been a prominent increase in specialized legislation to combat criminal behaviors related to computer crime, which include traditional crimes committed with the use of a computer and a variety of new, technologyspecific criminal behaviors spawned by the rapid emergence of computer technologies and the exponential expansion of the Internet. 10 However, despite the additional new laws, criminal prosecution is deterred because the legal proceeding is a tardy, time-consuming and expensive process, even when there are well-justified intentions to proceed with legal action.Also, legislation always lags behind the event such that either no appropriate laws are found or the new law is too late for the case in hand. Hence, computer laws are at best a deterrent to computer crime, not a guardian of information. Premise 3 Computer ethicists assert, on the one hand, that special ethical issues are raised because computers are special technology, and query, on the other hand, why there should be computer ethics since, for example, there is no such thing as telephone ethics even though the telephone is a special technology that makes a lowering change on the way individuals communicate with others. 1 However, information security is worthy of ethical consideration as many decisions in information technology affect a wide range of stakeholders . National and international computer societies have promoted codes of ethical practice and even written these codes into their constitutions. As technology advances, computers continue to have a greater impact on society.Therefore, computer ethics promotes the discussion of how much influence computers should have in areas such as information security, artificial intelligence and human communication. As the world of computers evolves, computer ethics continues to create ethical standards that address new issues raised by new technologies. Reference http//www. isaca. org/Journal http//plato. stanford. edu/entries/ethics-computer/ http//www. cmpe. boun. edu. tr/say/c150/intro/lit10. html