Rome vs. Han Essay Example for Free

Rome vs. Han tryRome and Han were two important civilizations which collapsed in galore(postnominal) similar ways. For instance, they were similar because they both had problems protecting their borders from attack nomads, which helped lead to their demise. Also, a nonher similarity is how the conglomerates split and create provinces. Although, there were similarities between these civilizations, there were also many an(prenominal) differences.One difference between the fall of the Han and the Roman pudding stones is how China had the ability to revive itself and return to its source glory under a new dynasty after the fall of the Han, and the land of the Roman Empire never regained its previous power. Another difference is the matter of isolation, and how it effects China and how being a trade harbinger in the Mediterranean helps the empire.First, one similarity between the fall of the Han and the Roman Empires is the problem of expansion. Expansion allows an empire to gain wealth and prosperity by expanding their control over land and trade routes. Although, the larger and empire becomes, the harder it is to maintain its boundaries and is also more susceptible to invasion by other empires or nomadic tribes. twain empires had to build walls to protect the northern side of the empire.Rome spread its borders to wide for them to control, so as Germanic stormrs started to invade from the north, Rome couldnt protect its borders which ranged from Macedonia to the Indus River Valley.The Han also had a similar problem with herders from the north. Many would invade small peasant villages and pillage whatever they needed or wanted.With a current problem of aliment the countries large population, this didnt help matters, actually it only when made matters worse. Riots and mobs formed which stormed major cities until finally the Han cast and China was split into three kingdoms similar to Rome being split into two kingdoms.Rome and Han had many difference s as well as similarities. One difference is after the decline China was revived during the tinkle dynasty, and brought back to a unified state while the lands of the Roman Empire was never able to tally its former height after the Germanic tribes invaded from the north. Although, the Eastern half of the Roman empire, the Byzantines survived and strengthened over the adjoining thousand years.Another difference between the Roman and the Han empires is isolation. China was uninvolved by mountains anddeserts to the west. This provided not only a natural barrier against invasions, but it helped create an isolation from the many other classical civilizations. Rome, on the other hand, was not isolated, it sat mostly on the Italian peninsula, which jutted out into the Mediterranean Sea, a fore ladderner in sea trade. China being isolated created a problem with the economy, where the governments silver only came from the taxation of the peasants and citizens.This depleted the money of the peasants and lower class, and quiet, the government didnt have enough money to run properly. This effected the outcome of the invasion of the Huns which helped lead to the Han downfall because the government didnt have enough money to pay for military action.Both the Roman Empire and Han Dynasty arose and expanded to become superpowers of their time, but at the leftover of their reign, China fell as it allow for do with many other dynasties after the Han, but still revive itself and create new. China has done this up to modern times, but Rome never recovers and will never become the superpower it once was again. It is amazing though how two civilizations that are completely isolated from each other can be so similar though, and still influence the world we sleep together in today.