Understanding Of Scottish Society :: essays research papers fc

AbstractThe concept of a nation state has onlyemerged over the last couple ofcenturies, before this point less travel and coherent statesmanaged the affairs of the populous.The nation state is the overlapping oftwo separate features. The nation is theidentity that individuals relate to indoorsthe society. This can exist on its own, asall that is needed is a person to feel thatthey have a connection with others on nomore than shared belonging. The stateis used to invade national feelings ofloyalty and use them to effectivelygovern muckles lives. The state almostlike a governmental overlay for anational identity to tend within.Scotland can be seen in this lightbecause it is a fine example of whatnationhood looks like, without theapparatus of the state to cloud thepicture. Scotland has this dual identity ofScottish nation within the confines of aBritish state.In answering this question it is necessary toinvestigate the origins of modern nation states.Firstly examining what the term Nation Statemeans by fault it down into its two parts. Lastly Iwill examine how accurate a term the Nation Stateis when applied to Scottish Society.The Nation State is a recent phenomena, with mostof kind history being founded on statelesssocieties. These stateless societies refer to thetribal and clan systems that existed across theglobe, before the emergence of larger societiessuch as Empires and Kingdoms. These societieswere fit to function as they were relatively small.The whole or at least a large part of the communitycould be involved in whatever decision that need to bemade, although because of their size complexdecision making processes were needed. With theincrease of population and the subsequentcompetition for limited resources, systems startedto emerge that could handle the new-sprung(prenominal) demands.Economies started to produce more than what wasrequired by the community, so the surplus was tradewith neighbouring communities. This process alsocreated the need for higher authority to govern thetransactions amongst the communities. Theseembryonic communities developed into what can bedescribed as traditional states, with a sovereignleader such as a King or Emperor who ruledabsolutely. They could do this because they held thereins of the states military forces. In Max Webersview this was the critical component of any state.For a state to be legitimate it mustiness have a monopolyof the use of violence within the confines of its ownterritory. However usually this was only a last resortand the ordinary people were quite unaware of thestate developing around them. A limited form ofgovernment would emerge to ensure that the Headof the State could rule effectively.