How Should I Judge the Goodness of My Actions Essay

How Should I Judge the Goodness of My Actions - Essay ExampleMills contends that individuals who have experienced the 2 pleasures have a higher perceptiveness to how they exist, using higher faculties. He implies that people with more aw atomic number 18ness to the world need more for them to be happy. Those who are knowledgeable, while subject to ignorance in enjoying constitute pleasures, maintain withstanding lower grades of pleasure. Finally, as people, we act in specific ways in order to meet out desires and the decisions made are governed, somewhat, by sanctions. cardinal types of sanctions exist, i.e. internal and external. External sanctions are outside of the person and are inclusive of such means as the influence from other(a) people for example, the approval, and disapproval of other people to our actions (Kahn, 2010). It can also be from ideas like the fear of God and punishment from God for acting contrary to his word. Internal sanctions, on the other hand, are equi valent to ones conscience. These are the inner thoughts resonating in ones mind with regards to actions or ideas. Internal sanctions have a great influence since the mind has a consistent presence in ones lifetime. ... Those who help others in order to be happy do so out of an effort to get personal benefits and non for duty alone. Therefore, firstly, motivation for this type of good will needs to be duty bound and not for the manner in which it makes one feel when showing generosity. handicrafts second characteristic contends that true duty must not be performed with reckon effect (Munzel, 2012). This means that if an individual decides to donate boreholes to a community in Africa he would not desire to get a tax deduction for it. Duty also requires one to act out of respect for morality, where humanity should behave according to duty and its properties, rather than for the self-serving outcome or motivation. Action, therefore, is only interpreted to be good if its reasoning do es not contradict itself and makes sense. Kant is emphatic of this when he discusses lying, questioning whether he would be contented if his lying maxim were a everyday law to him and to others (Munzel, 2012). On examining the idea, universal application of lying, would fail with all people practicing and expecting lies. Therefore, reasons governing actions can also be referred to as imperatives. He separates exteriorly motivated duties and sublimate duty by referring to them as hypothetical and categorical imperatives respectively. Categorical imperatives are concerned with the principle an action follows, unlike hypothetical imperatives. The debate between the two is whether an individuals sense of duty is compromised by consequential appeal, i.e. where murdering an individual is to the benefit of other many people, is the killing justified? Kant would hold that killing is not permissible in any situation even where the person is a dictator who oppresses and kill