Philosophy †Empiricism Essay

Immanuel Kant set about to expose that the skepticism of the empiricists was unfounded and that science was possible. How does he do this and is his solution executable (that is, did he actually rescue science from the skeptics)? Through his theory of friendship, Immanuel Kant provided a philosophical answer to Humes skepticism. Kant agreed that knowledge did have a source the humean fragment of sensory impressions, however he claim that in that respect was an additional element in knowledge, which was not derived from sensory feature.The second element that Kant spoke of was derived from the sound judgment itself. Kant felt that the human mind, outfitted with its own subtle concepts was nothing like the human mind of empiricists Locke and Hume, whom claimed the mind was as a blank tablet or empty cupboard. Opposing Hume, Kant proposed that the mind was fitted out(p) with twelve pure concepts of understanding broken down into four categories. Additionally, Kant argued that t he mind was not passive at all, as Hume and the other empiricists had claimed.Quantity fibre Relation Modality unity affirmation substance-accidents possibility plurality negation cause-effect actuality entireness limitation causal reciprocity necessity The mind for Kant, was indeed active, it actively interprets the world rather than simply receiving and recording into memory, what it gathers from the external world through with(predicate) the senses. Through the above-menti integrityd categories, the mind organizes the sensory flux and gives it meaning as substances.Kant considered that the categories were logically prior to experience, presupposed by all experience and that they are self-employed person of experience thus experience could never alter them. Kant deemed the categories were responsible for unmatcheds experiences and knowledge, and ultimately were ones source of understanding. The categories or priori equipt the necessary component for which Hume believed knowle dge lacked. Kant denied Humes theory of knowledge, which reduced ones experience and knowledge to nothing but sense impressions.Kant reduces Humes theory to nothing at all, as it did not account for the concomitant that human posses scientific knowledge outside of animal faith. Kant believed that Hume avoided the key questions of How is experience of objects possible, and How is science possible. For this reason, Kant felt that Humes theory failed to distinguish that knowledge consisted of both the empirical element and the categories. Kants solution in my whimsy is viable, as the categories show that there is a necessary connection between the causes and effects.